What are the differences between a Bivens Action and a 42 USC 1983 lawsuit?

42 USC 1983 is a statute, a law enacted by Congress.  The law allows a person whose Constitutional rights were violated by government officials to sue in federal court.  The defendant in the case must be someone acting on behalf of a state or local government.  A plaintiff can also sue a local government, such as a city, for violating his constitutional rights.  

Congress passed 42 USC 1983 because of a concern after the United States Civil War that southern states deprived black people of their Constitutional rights.  42 USC 1983 empowers victims to sue state officials, and those acting on their behalf.

A Bivens Action is different because the defendant in a Bivens Action is alleged to be acting on behalf of the federal government, not a state government.  The Supreme Court, in Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), held that plaintiffs whose Constitutional rights were violated by persons acting on behalf of the federal government have a right to sue in federal court.  The plaintiff in that case was named Warren Bivens so now we call these types of cases "Bivens Actions".  


I made a short video on Bivens Actions.



There are no comments yet, be the first to make one!

Leave a Comment: